[Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Health Workers During the Second Year of the Pandemic in Latin America: Cross-Sectional Survey Study]. / Impacto psicológico del COVID-19 en los trabajadores sanitarios durante el segundo año de pandemia en Latinoamérica: estudio de encuesta transversal.

Introduction: The coronavirus pandemic continues to affect the mental health of healthcare personnel in Latin America (LA). Objective: To estimate the prevalence of psychological disturbances and associated risk factors for mental health in healthcare personnel in LA during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: This multicenter cross-sectional study included a total sample of 5437 healthcare professionals from Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru. The PHQ-9, GAD-7, and a brief demographic questionnaire were used. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was estimated based on the cut-off points of the instruments. Two multivariate logistic regressions were performed. Results: A population burden of anxiety (40.1%) and depression (62.2%) was found in healthcare personnel in LA. Among professionals in Argentina (OR = 1.374; P<.001), those working in state hospitals (OR = 1.536; P<.003), frontline healthcare workers for COVID patients (OR = 1.848; P<.001), general practitioners (OR = 1.335; P<.001), and specialists (OR = 1.298; P<.001), a higher risk of experiencing mental disorders was observed. Among women, younger personnel, and administrative staff, a higher probability of experiencing anxiety and depression was identified. Conclusions: The burden of mental disorders on healthcare personnel in Latin America is alarming. Psychological support services are necessary, aimed at providing measures for professionals to develop healthy coping mechanisms that mitigate the impact of the pandemic on their well-being and facilitate post-crisis adjustment.

Impacto psicológico del Covid-19 en los trabajadores sanitarios durante el segundo año de pandemia en Latinoamérica: Estudio de encuesta transversal Psychological Impact of Covid-19 on Health Workers during the Second Year of the Pandemic in Latin America: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

La pandemia del Coronavirus continúa afectando la salud mental del personal sanitario en Latinoamérica (LA). Objetivo. Estimar la prevalencia de las alteraciones psicológicas y los factores de riesgo asociados a la salud mental en el personal de salud de LA, durante el segundo año de pandemia del Covid-19. Método. Estudio transversal multicéntrico que incluyó una muestra total de 5437 profesionales de la salud de Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador y Perú. Se utilizó el PHQ-9, el GAD-7 junto a un cuestionario demográfico breve. Se estimó la prevalencia de ansiedad y depresión a partir de los puntos de corte de los instrumentos. Se realizaron 2 regresiones logísticas multivariantes. Resultados. Se encontró una carga poblacional de ansiedad (40,1%) y depresión (62,2%) en el personal sanitario de LA. En los profesionales de Argentina (OR=1,374;p<0,001), quienes trabajan en hospitales estatales (OR=1,536;p<0,003), de primera línea de atención de pacientes con Covid (OR=1,848;p<0,001), en los médicos generales (OR=1,335;p<0,001), especialistas (OR=1,298;p<0,001), se observó un mayor riesgo de sufrir trastornos mentales. A su vez, en las mujeres, el personal más joven y en los administrativos se identificó una mayor probabilidad para sufrir ansiedad y depresión. Conclusiones. La carga de trastornos mentales en el personal de salud de Latinoamérica es alarmante. Es necesario servicios de apoyo psicológico, orientados a proporcionar medidas para que los profesionales desarrollen mecanismos de afrontamiento saludables que mitiguen el impacto de la pandemia en su bienestar y faciliten el ajuste posterior a la crisis sanitaria.

Factors associated with cognitive impairment in Latin American older adults: A cross-sectional observational study of COVID-19 confinement.

INTRODUCTION: The effects of COVID-19 confinement have been severe, especially in older adults. Therefore, we analyzed the factors associated with cognitive impairment (CI) in Latin America (LA). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study with a total of 5245 older adults from 10 countries in LA. Measurement: We used the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) and the Eight-item Informant Interview to Differentiate Aging and Dementia (AD8) scale. RESULTS: We found that age, depressive symptomatology, bone fractures, being widowed, having a family member with dementia, and unemployment were associated with an increased risk of CI. In contrast, higher education, hypertension with continuous treatment, quarantine, and keeping stimulating cognitive and physical activities were associated with a lower probability of CI. No significant association was found between suffering from diabetes or being retired and CI. DISCUSSION: It is essential to conduct follow-up studies on these factors, considering their relationship with CI and the duration of confinement.

Subjective cognitive decline, object cognition and emotional states in older Peruvian adults during COVID‐19 pandemic

Background Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is considered a risk factor for developing dementia. Its relationship with objective cognitive performance and emotional functioning is not yet clear. We investigated the association between SCD, objective cognition and emotional states in older adults from Arequipa, Peru. Methods 43 older adults between 55 and 86 years old (mean = 69.72) completed a clinical and neuropsychological evaluation prior the lockdown for COVID‐19 pandemic. We used the Beck depression inventory (BDI) and Pfeffer functional scale as a clinical protocol. The Peruvian version of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), the Trail Making Test (TMT A and B), the Stroop test, the Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) and verbal fluency tasks were used to assess cognition. All participants were also evaluated by telephone during the COVID‐19 pandemic using a broad psychological protocol that included the everyday cognition (E‐COG) as a measure of SCD and the total score and emotional subscale of the Epidemic Pandemic Impact Inventory (EPII). We used nonparametric correlation statistics. Results We observed significant associations between the BDI scores and the total E‐COG (Rho = .347, p = .022) and between the BDI and the memory subscale of E‐COG (Rho = .425, p = .004). Further, we observed significant relationships between the emotional subscale of the EPII and the total E‐COG (Rho = .344, p = .023). There were no significant relationships between neuropsychological measures with the E‐COG and EPII. Conclusions Our findings are consistent with previous studies that have shown that SCD is more associated with emotional states than with objective cognitive performance. Likewise, findings suggest that reported emotional changes during the pandemic may have impacted SCD, but not cognitive performance.

Pandemic‐Related Stress, Coping, and Wellbeing in an International and Multi‐Ethnic Cohort of Older Adults

Background The COVID‐19 pandemic has impacted the wellbeing of older adults. Pandemic‐related stress has implications on cognitive status, including decline due to Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Yet, evidence suggests that COVID‐19 has impacted culturally and linguistically diverse communities differently. We sought to examine the role of COVID‐19 on coping and wellbeing in an international, multi‐ethnic sample of older adults. Method Data from 955 older adults (age = 66.7±7.9 years;education = 15.2±5.9 years;71% female;41% Hispanic/Latino) were pulled from a larger, international sample examining the response of older adults to COVID‐19. All participants completed demographic questionnaires, measures of psychological distress, the Brief‐COPE – a 28‐item self‐report questionnaire used to measure respondent's efforts to minimize distress from a stressful life event – and the Epidemic‐Pandemic Impacts Inventory (EPII) – a 92‐item inventory of pandemic related experiences across several life domains. Using linear regression, we examined relationships between Brief‐COPE scores, ethnicity, and select EPII items controlling for several covariates (age, sex, education, marital status, number of children, employment status, household income, and history of COVID‐19 symptoms) in all analyses. Result Hispanic/Latino (H/L) ethnicity was associated with slightly higher scores on the approach‐focused coping subscale compared to the non‐Hispanic White (NHW) group (Approach: 27.3±6.6 vs 26.1±6.1;B = 1.205, p = 0.015, CI: 0.238, 2.172). There was no effect of ethnicity on Brief‐COPE Total or Avoidance subscale scores (both ps>0.050). Notably, review of covariates suggested increased age was associated with lower scores on Approach (B = ‐0.065, p = 0.041, CI: ‐0.128, ‐0.003), Avoidance (B = ‐0.054, p = 0.034, CI: ‐0.104, ‐0.004), and Total scores (B = ‐0.136, p = 0.028, CI: ‐0.257, ‐0.015). Higher Approach scores were associated with greater endorsement of Positive Life Changes in both ethnic groups (NHW: partial r = 0.298, p<0.001;H/L: partial r = 0.249, p<0.036), but with endorsement of Mental Health Problems in NHWs only (NHW: partial r = 0.144;p = 0.001;H/L: partial r = ‐0.019, p>0.050). Conclusion Findings suggest cross‐cultural differences in the stress coping response of older adults during the pandemic, even after controlling for symptomatic history and other relevant covariates. Moreover, coping may be differentially related to positive and negative outcomes across cultural groups. These results support the need to consider cultural background when considering coping and wellbeing in older adults.

IMPACT OF THE COVID‐19 PANDEMIC IN ADRD PATIENTS AND CAREGIVERS IN A LATIN‐AMERICAN COUNTRY

Background Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementia (ADRD) patients and caregivers have been significantly affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic and have seen their access to healthcare disrupted. ADRD has emerged as a key comorbidity of COVID‐19. Little is known about the impact of the pandemic in ADRD patients living in countries with reduced vaccinations rates. Our objective was to assess the impact of the pandemic in ADRD patients and caregivers in Peru, which has one of the world's highest COVID‐19 death rate. Method As part of the Genetics of Alzheimer's disease In Peruvian Populations (GAPP) study, we performed a cross‐sectional study in ADRD patients and caregivers. We employed the National Alzheimer Coordination Center COVID‐19 survey to evaluate the impact of the pandemic in our cohort. We also considered the severity of cognitive impairment, measured by the Cognitive Dementia Rating Scale (CDR). Result the GAPP cohort had 52 ADRD cases and 213 controls. The median age was 72 (54‐95 IQR 12), and 68.68% were females. A third of patients reported COVID‐19 symptoms;of those, 2.71% were hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit (1 patient needed respirator). Over 50% of participants reported at least some cognitive or behavioral changes (with memory being the most predominant), with no difference between cases and controls. Overall, participants felt moderately concerned with infection and social distancing, with no differences between groups. Caregivers reported higher degrees of concern, especially for ADRD participants. 25% of caregivers reported being affected significantly by the pandemic, mainly because of decreased takeover by family or friends, especially among those looking after ADRD participants. Over 50% considered their income reduced. Finally, their willingness to participate in research projects was not impacted significantly. Conclusion The COVID‐19 pandemic has impacted ADRD patients (especially those with higher CDR) and their caregivers, reducing their financial income and their caregiving ability. These results could help in developing COVID‐19 public health policies that include specific needs for ADRD patients.

Clinical utility of Phototest via teleneuropsychology in Chilean rural older adults UTILIDADE CLÍNICA DO PHOTOTEST VIA TELENEUROPSICOLOGIA EM IDOSOS RURAIS CHILENOS

. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the need for neuropsychological care for older adults with memory complaints in different contexts, including rural areas or areas with difficult access. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the clinical utility of the Phototest, through telemedicine, to identify mild cognitive impairment in rural older adults with memory complaints, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional, case-control, and clinical utility comparison of brief cognitive tests (BCTs). The sample included 111 rural elderly people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 130 healthy controls from the Los Lagos region, Chile. The instruments adopted were modified Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSEm) and adapted version of the Phototest (PT) for Chile. Results: To identify mild cognitive impairment, using a cutoff score of 27-28 points, the Phototest showed a sensitivity of 96.6% and a specificity of 81.8%;indicators superior to those of the MMSEm. Conclusions: The Phototest is more accurate than the MMSEm in identifying cognitive alterations in rural older adults with cognitive memory complaints through telemedicine. Therefore, its use in primary care is recommended in order to perform early detection of preclinical cognitive alterations in mild cognitive impairment or neurodegenerative diseases.

Clinical utility of Phototest via teleneuropsychology in Chilean rural older adults.

The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the need for neuropsychological care for older adults with memory complaints in different contexts, including rural areas or areas with difficult access. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the clinical utility of the Phototest, through telemedicine, to identify mild cognitive impairment in rural older adults with memory complaints, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional, case-control, and clinical utility comparison of brief cognitive tests (BCTs). The sample included 111 rural elderly people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 130 healthy controls from the Los Lagos region, Chile. The instruments adopted were modified Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSEm) and adapted version of the Phototest (PT) for Chile. Results: To identify mild cognitive impairment, using a cutoff score of 27-28 points, the Phototest showed a sensitivity of 96.6% and a specificity of 81.8%; indicators superior to those of the MMSEm. Conclusions: The Phototest is more accurate than the MMSEm in identifying cognitive alterations in rural older adults with cognitive memory complaints through telemedicine. Therefore, its use in primary care is recommended in order to perform early detection of preclinical cognitive alterations in mild cognitive impairment or neurodegenerative diseases.

A pandemia de COVID-19 mostrou a necessidade de cuidados neuropsicológicos para adultos idosos com queixas de memória em diferentes contextos, incluindo áreas rurais ou áreas de difícil acesso. Objetivo: Analisar a utilidade clínica do Phototest, por meio da telemedicina, para identificar uma leve deficiência cognitiva em adultos idosos rurais com queixas de memória, durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos: Realizamos uma comparação transversal, caso-controle e utilidade clínica dos testes cognitivos breves. Amostra: Cento e onze idosos rurais com deficiência cognitiva leve (DCL) e 130 controles saudáveis da região de Los Lagos, Chile. Instrumentos: Minimental modificado (MMSEm) e versão do teste fotográfico (PT) adaptada para o Chile. Resultados: Para identificar a DCL, usando pontuação de corte de 27-28 pontos, o Phototest mostrou sensibilidade de 96,6% e especificidade de 81,8%; indicadores superiores aos do MMSEm. Conclusões: O Phototest é mais preciso que o MMSEm para identificar, por meio da telemedicina, alterações cognitivas em adultos idosos rurais com queixas de memória cognitiva. Sendo assim, seu uso na atenção primária é recomendado para realizar a detecção precoce de alterações cognitivas pré-clínicas em DCL ou doenças neurodegenerativas.

Validity of the PHQ-2 questionnaire for the detection of depression in Colombian health personnel during Covid-19 / Validez del cuestionario PHQ-2 para la detección de depresión en personal sanitario colombiano durante Covid-19

RESUMEN: Introducción: La sintomatologia depresiva en profesionales de la salud asociado a crisis virales es de alta prevalencia a nivel global, siendo su detección una prioridad por lo cual, el objetivo de esta investigación fue analizar la validez convergente y consistencia interna del cuestionario de salud del paciente-2 (PHQ-2) en profesionales sanitarios. Método: Estudio eSalud donde se recopilaron datos transversales en línea (n=725), de 281 médicos generales, 237 médicos especialistas y 207 enfermeras durante la cuarentena colombiana, entre el 20 de abril y el 10 de agosto de 2020. Edad promedio 41,3 años (± 8,76). El 38,4% eran hombres (278) y el 61.6% mujeres (447). El 66.1% del personal sanitario atendió pacientes contagiados por coronavirus y el 33,9% no prestó estos servicios. Se administró la versión de 9 ítems del PHQ, validada en población colombiana junto a la versión de 2 ítems del PHQ. Resultados: Se encontró una alta correlación entre las escalas (r=.860, P<0.001), demostrando la validez convergente del PHQ-2 para medir la sintomatología depresiva. La consistencia interna del PHQ-2 fue adecuada, con un Alpha de Cronbach de 0.80 (I.C.= 0.76 - 0.83). Conclusiones: El PHQ-2 presenta adecuados estándares psicométricos de confiabilidad y validez, por lo que su rápida administración, fácil calificación e interpretación, lo convierte en un instrumento confiable y valido para la detección rápida, sin sobrecargas laborales, de los síntomas depresivos en médicos y enfermeras que atiendan o no pacientes en condiciones de brotes virales.

ABSTRACT Background: Depressive symptomatology in health professionals associated with viral crises is highly prevalent globally, being its detection a priority. Therefore, the objective of this research was to analyze the convergent validity and internal consistency of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) in healthcare professionals. Method: E-Health study where cross-sectional data was collected online (n = 725), from 281 general practitioners, 237 specialist doctors and 207 nurses during the Colombian quarantine, between April 20 and August 10, 2020. Average age 41.3 years (± 8.76). 38.4% were men (278) and 61.6% women (447). 66.1% of health personnel treated patients infected with coronavirus and 33.9% did not provide these services. The 9-item version of the PHQ was administered, validated in the Colombian population together with the 2-item version of the PHQ. Results: A high correlation was found between the scales (r = .860, P <0.001), demonstrating the convergent validity of the PHQ-2 to measure depressive symptomatology. The internal consistency of the PHQ-2 was adequate, with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.80 (I.C. = 0.76 - 0.83). Conclusions: The PHQ-2 has adequate psychometric standards of reliability and validity, so its rapid administration, easy qualification and interpretation, makes it a reliable and valid instrument for the rapid detection, without work overload, of depressive symptoms in doctors and nurses whether or not they care for patients with viral outbreaks.

The cumulative effect of fibromyalgia symptoms on cognitive performance: The mediating role of pain.

Fibromyalgia (FMS) is a chronic condition that encompasses widespread pain associated with cognitive impairment and significant emotional distress related to functional disability. This study aimed to obtain evidence of the role of pain in the effect of time since FMS diagnosis and cognitive performance using a novel online protocol of neuropsychological evaluation since the COVID-19 pandemic has challenged traditional neuropsychology testing leading to the need for novel procedures transitioning to tele-neuropsychology. A sample of 70 adult women was evaluated (50 with FMS and 19 controls) using online questionnaires that evaluated pain and executive functioning (impulsivity, inhibition control, monitoring, and planning). Afterward, participants were evaluated by trained neuropsychologists in a 30 min online session using virtually adapted cognitive tests: the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (memory), the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (attention and speed processing), the F-A-S test (verbal fluency), and Digit Span tests (working memory). We found that the time of FMS diagnosis has an effect on cognitive functioning predominantly mediated by pain. Our results point out the role of pain as a mediator on cognitive performance, specifically in executive functions which are directly affected by the cumulative effect of the time of diagnosis. Furthermore, the importance of considering a broader perspective for assessment and treatment including novel procedures via tele-neuropsychology.

Prevalencia y factores asociados con las quejas cognitivas subjetivas del personal sanitario latinoamericano durante la pandemia de COVID-19 Prevalence and factors associated with subjective cognitive complaints in Latin American health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introducción y objetivos: Se ha observado un incremento de alteraciones emocionales y quejas sobre el rendimiento cognitivo en el personal sanitario latinoamericano durante la pandemia de SARS-CoV-2;lo cual puede afectar a las capacidades de atención y aumentar los niveles de estrés y burnout de estos profesionales. El objetivo es analizar las quejas cognitivas subjetivas (QCS) y los factores asociados en el personal sanitario durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en 5 países de América Latina. Métodos: Estudio transversal multicéntrico que incluyó a 3.738 profesionales de Colombia, Chile, Argentina, Ecuador, Bolivia y Perú. Se utilizó la Escala de Trastorno de Ansiedad Generalizada (GAD-7) y el Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) para valorar la depresión y el Mini-Z para evaluar el burnout. Para las QCS se usó un ítem sobre preocupaciones cognitivas en atención y memoria. Resultados: Se observó una prevalencia de queja cognitiva del 69,2%. Los factores asociados con un mayor riesgo de QCS fueron las puntuaciones en GAD-7, PHQ y Mini-Z, además de ser parte del personal de salud del Ecuador. Conclusiones: La prevalencia de QCS en el personal sanitario es alta y está modulada por estados emocionales y estrés.

Impact of quarantine due to COVID-19 pandemic on health and lifestyle conditions in older adults from Centro American countries.

BACKGROUND: The impact of quarantine in older adults have been reported in several studies with contradictory results, reporting from negative effects to no significant outcomes or even beneficial consequences. Heterogeneity in aging plays a role in each region, the aim of this study is to analyze the impact of quarantine on health conditions (physical and mental) and lifestyle in older adults in five Centro American countries during COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: In this cross-sectional study, n = 712 older adults 60 years and older from Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras and Costa Rica were assessed by telephone. Sociodemographic data, physical and mental health, lifestyle and quarantine conditions were asked previous informed consent. RESULTS: In general, mean of days in quarantine at the moment of the study was 142 days (approximately four months and three weeks). In the analysis of the impact of the days in quarantine effects were found on the frequency of falls, functional ability in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), general cognitive function, memory, orientation, language, frequency of drinking alcohol, having a balanced diet, and being active cognitively. Some differences were found between countries. CONCLUSIONS: Effects of quarantine on older adults in Centro America, requires attention of governments and healthcare to prevent long term morbidity and disability, and to promote healthy aging.

Prevalence of Dementia and Associated Factors among Older Adults in Latin America during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a great impact on cognitive health in Latin American older adults, increasing the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. Our objective was to analyze the prevalence of dementia and the associated factors in Latin American older adults during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: A multicentric first phase cross-sectional observational study was conducted during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Five thousand two hundred and forty-five Latin American adults over 60 years of age were studied in 10 countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, the Dominican Republic, and Venezuela. We used the telephone version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the “Alzheimer Disease 8” scale for functional and cognitive changes, and the abbreviated version of the Yesavage depression scale. We also asked for sociodemographic and lockdown data. All the evaluation was made by telephone. Cross-tabulations and χ2 tests were used to determine the variability of the prevalence of impairment by sociodemographic characteristics and binary logistic regression to assess the association between dementia and sociodemographic factors. Results: We observed that the prevalence of dementia in Latin America is 15.6%, varying depending on the country (Argentine = 7.83 and Bolivia = 28.5%). The variables most associated with dementia were race and age. It does not seem to be associated with the pandemic but with social and socio-health factors. Conclusion: The prevalence of dementia shows a significant increase in Latin America, attributable to a constellation of ethnic, demographic, and socioeconomic factors.

[GAD-7 Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale in Colombian medical professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: construct validity and reliability]. / Escala de ansiedad generalizada GAD-7 en profesionales médicos colombianos durante pandemia de COVID-19: validez de constructo y confiabilidad.

Introduction: The detection of anxiety symptoms among health workers who care for patients infected with COVID-19 is a current priority. Fast and valid instruments are required for this population group. The objective is to establish the construct validity and reliability of the Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale in Colombian doctors during the COVID-19 lockdown.Methods: E-health study, in which cross-sectional data were collected online (n=1,030) from 610 COVID doctors and 420 non-COVID doctors, during the Colombian lockdown, between 20 April and 10 August 2020. Each subject was contacted, and they confirmed their participation, identity and professional role.Results: A single factor factorial structure was found, made up of the 7 items of the instrument, which managed to explain 70% of the variance. The goodness of fit indices (RMSEA = 0.080; CFI = 0.995; SRMR = 0.053; p <0.001) showed an "acceptable" unidimensionality and adequate factor loadings in each item of the GAD-7, >0.070. Finally, the internal consistency of the instrument was good, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.920 (95%IC, 8.80-9.71).Conclusions: The GAD-7 is an instrument that presents adequate indicators of validity and reliability. It is an excellent tool that is reliable and easy and fast to use for the detection of generalised anxiety symptoms in medical personnel caring (or not) for patients infected with COVID-19.

The impact of COVID-19 on the well-being and cognition of older adults living in the United States and Latin America.

BACKGROUND: In the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults from vulnerable ethnoracial groups are at high risk of infection, hospitalization, and death. We aimed to explore the pandemic's impact on the well-being and cognition of older adults living in the United States (US), Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Peru. METHODS: 1,608 (646 White, 852 Latino, 77 Black, 33 Asian; 72% female) individuals from the US and four Latin American countries aged ≥ 55 years completed an online survey regarding well-being and cognition during the pandemic between May and September 2020. Outcome variables (pandemic impact, discrimination, loneliness, purpose of life, subjective cognitive concerns) were compared across four US ethnoracial groups and older adults living in Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Peru. FINDINGS: Mean age for all participants was 66.7 (SD = 7.7) years and mean education was 15.4 (SD = 2.7) years. Compared to Whites, Latinos living in the US reported greater economic impact (p < .001, ηp 2  = 0.031); while Blacks reported experiencing discrimination more often (p < .001, ηp 2  = 0.050). Blacks and Latinos reported more positive coping (p < .001, ηp 2  = 0.040). Compared to Latinos living in the US, Latinos in Chile, Mexico, and Peru reported greater pandemic impact, Latinos in Mexico and Peru reported more positive coping, Latinos in Argentina, Mexico, and Peru had greater economic impact, and Latinos in Argentina, Chile, and Peru reported less discrimination. INTERPRETATION: The COVID-19 pandemic has differentially impacted the well-being of older ethnically diverse individuals in the US and Latin America. Future studies should examine how mediators like income and coping skills modify the pandemic's impact. FUNDING: Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Psychiatry.